Canada: Competition Bureau
The Competition Bureau (Bureau) employs a balanced approach through active enforcement, advocacy and outreach to ensure a competitive and innovative marketplace that benefits consumers, businesses and the Canadian economy. We recognise that competition and innovation are key elements of a healthy, sustainable economy. Businesses are driven to innovate in competitive markets, leading to increased productivity, efficiency and economic growth.
In the rapidly changing global economy, technological advances are enabling a wave of innovative new products, services and business models. These innovations are bringing about significant benefits for consumers and growth opportunities for businesses. In order to maximise the potential benefits for Canadians, the Bureau took action in 2017–18 to foster open and competitive markets in which innovation can thrive.
Competition and innovation in the digital economy
The digital economy is changing the way Canadians work, live and interact. It is bringing new opportunities for economic growth, to attract investment and to create new jobs. At the Bureau, we took targeted action to support the Canadian economy by investigating and deterring anticompetitive conduct and deceptive marketing practices in several key sectors.
2017–18 key achievements
Digital economy cases commenced
Digital economy cases ongoing
Digital economy cases resolved
Putting the squeeze on drip pricing
Canadians need to have trust that the prices they see advertised online are the ones they will actually pay. That trust is easily broken when online retailers add hidden fees and charges to their products and services.
Drip pricing, for example, is a practice where extra fees are incrementally added at different stages of the online buying process, causing the final price to be much higher than advertised. Last year, we took on key players in the car rental industry over hidden fees, resulting in a total of C$2.25 million in administrative monetary penalties for Hertz/Dollar Thrifty and Enterprise Rent-A-Car. We also took legal action against Ticketmaster over alleged misleading ticket price advertising – sending a strong message to online retailers that false or misleading claims will not be tolerated.
Enabling digital innovation through competition
In a big win for competition and consumers, the case against the Toronto Real Estate Board (TREB) was upheld by the Federal Court of Appeal. It was found that TREB had blocked its members from offering certain innovative online brokerage services, preventing home buyers and sellers from taking advantage of a wide range of options when making one of the most significant financial transactions of their lives. By lifting restrictions on access and use of real estate data, agents will be able to offer consumers new services that provide insights into home sales prices and trends online. Following the Federal Court of Appeal decision, TREB sought leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada. The Bureau opposed this application, and will continue to fight for increased competition and innovation in this important sector.
In January 2018, the Bureau reached a consent agreement with Softvoyage Inc, a Canadian developer of travel-related software, regarding restrictive terms in its contracts with tour operators and travel agencies which excluded rival companies. This resolution is expected to open the door to greater competition and innovation in the travel industry, resulting in more choices for Canadian travellers.
A new chapter for e-book competition in Canada
We continued to work to restore price competition for e-books, having found that certain publishers had entered into an arrangement preventing Canadian retailers from offering discounts on their e-books. This meant that Canadians saw identical prices for the vast majority of those publishers’ e-books no matter where they shopped. In the wake of consent agreements reached in early 2017 with Apple and three e-book publishers – Hachette, Macmillan and Simon & Schuster – we reached a similar consent agreement in early 2018 with a fourth e-book publisher, HarperCollins. The agreements with e-book publishers enable Canadian retailers to offer discounts on e-books to consumers.
In February 2018, the Federal Court rejected an application by Kobo, Canada’s largest e-book retailer, which challenged certain of the consent agreements between the Bureau and e-book publishers. The Federal Court decision upheld the Hachette, Macmillan and Simon & Schuster consent agreements and cleared the way for the HarperCollins agreement to come into force. The decision paves the way for Canadian retailers to offer consumers the benefit of retail price competition in the e-book marketplace.
Cartels and bid-rigging
Conspiracies among competitors to fix prices, allocate markets, restrict output or rig bids harm consumers and businesses by driving up prices and limiting choice in the marketplace. We continued to crack down on cartels in 2017–18. We focused on high-impact cases, resulting in significant fines being imposed by courts against companies that participated in bid-rigging and conspiracy in the auto parts and infrastructure sectors, among others.
2017–18 key achievements
Fines imposed in cartel cases
Promotional activities in support of the tip line
Immunity markers granted to applicants
Protecting competition in Canada’s grocery stores
When all players in the marketplace follow the rules, everybody wins. Our work helps to prevent and deter anticompetitive conduct like price fixing and bid-rigging that threaten the growth of the Canadian economy, and the confidence consumers have in it.
For example, Canadians expect to pay fair prices for everyday staples like bread. When it turns out they may not have, it becomes major news. Last year, we uncovered an alleged scheme between the country’s largest bread makers and grocery retailers to fix the price of fresh commercial bread. As part of our ongoing investigation we executed searches to gather more information about the alleged offences. In the coming year we will continue this important work to combat price fixing in the Canadian grocery sector.
Making a difference through high-impact cases
In November 2017, Irving Oil Ltd pleaded guilty to one count of retail price maintenance in Quebec and was fined C$287,583. It follows a wider Bureau investigation that resulted in charges being laid against 39 individuals and 15 companies in 2008, 2010 and 2012 for their role in a gasoline price-fixing conspiracy in the province of Quebec.
In the auto parts sector, our sustained efforts to address international bid-rigging conspiracies once again led to substantial fines being brought against the companies involved. In April 2017, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation pleaded guilty to three counts of bid-rigging and was fined C$13.4 million by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice – one of the largest bid-rigging fines ever ordered by a court in Canada. In December 2017, Japanese manufacturer NGK Spark Plug Co, Ltd also pleaded guilty to one count of bid-rigging and was fined C$550,000.
In October 2017, Cardinal Ventilation Inc was fined C$375,000 after pleading guilty to bid-rigging related to three condominium development projects in Montreal. The company admitted it had won a ventilation contract by conspiring with competing firms to ensure its bid was the lowest – and then reciprocating that arrangement to ensure the competing firms would get the contracts for other projects. This sixth guilty plea concludes the Bureau’s Quebec ventilation case, with more than C$1 million in total fines handed down by the courts.
Last year we also focused our efforts on public procurement, where bid-rigging can increase contract costs that are ultimately borne by taxpayers. In November 2017, we wrapped up our bid-rigging investigation into sewer service cartels in Quebec with a seventh and final guilty plea.
Giving Canadians a voice against cartels
Information and complaints from the public are essential to identifying and understanding potential cartel behaviour. That’s why it is important for us to continually improve the tools and programmes that allow Canadians to share what they know. Our best weapon against cartels are our Immunity and Leniency Programs. Under the Immunity Program, the first party to disclose to the Bureau an offence not yet detected or to provide evidence leading to the filing of charges, may be entitled to full immunity from prosecution. Any individual or organisation that does not qualify for immunity can apply for leniency. Under the Leniency Program, qualifying applicants can be eligible for leniency in sentencing for reporting cartel offences to the Bureau and cooperating with an investigation. Consultations began last year on how to update these programmes to increase their transparency and predictability.
We also launched a dedicated tip line that allows the public to report suspected instances of fraud, collusion or corruption affecting federal government contracts, helping build trust in government procurement. In its first year of operation, the Bureau received 140 tips through the telephone tip line and online form. This joint initiative with Public Services and Procurement Canada and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police complements the measures already in place to ensure that federal contracts are lawful, ethical and fair.
Canada-wide competition promotion
Market participants have the ultimate responsibility to comply with Canada’s competition laws. In order to ensure compliance, they need reliable, clear guidance.
2017–18 key achievements
Compliance outreach events
Helping small- and medium-sized businesses prevent anticompetitive behaviour
In 2017–18, we delivered more than 30 compliance presentations across the country – giving companies the knowledge and tools needed to develop their own corporate compliance programmes and help prevent anticompetitive behaviour before it occurs. Our outreach focused on small- and medium-sized businesses, which typically lack the resources needed to adopt compliance programmes.
We provided targeted outreach and bid-rigging presentations to public procurement authorities to help them promote compliance throughout their own organisations. Such outreach also facilitates information sharing, enabling public procurement authorities to provide the Bureau with information about the procurement activities they are seeing in their work. This engagement demonstrates the Bureau’s continued commitment to shared compliance – reinforcing that compliance with the law is a shared responsibility.
We review mergers of all sizes and in all sectors of the economy to ensure they will not substantially lessen or prevent competition. This ensures that consumers and businesses continue to benefit from a dynamic marketplace that offers innovative products and services, increased choice and competitive prices. In 2017–18, we completed 231 merger reviews, including 70 complex reviews, in industries that have a significant impact on the day-to-day lives of Canadians. We reached six consent agreements that required merging companies to sell assets or take other measures to address competition concerns.
2017–18 key achievements
Non-complex merger reviews concluded
Complex merger reviews concluded
Merger-related consent agreements
Making sure mergers do not harm competition and innovation
When competitors merge, the loss of a rival can reduce the incentive of market participants to innovate and bring new and better products to market. Last year, we concluded that the proposed merger between EI du Pont de Nemours and Company (DuPont) and The Dow Chemical Company (Dow) would likely decrease competition and innovation in the development and supply of crop protection products and certain packaging plastics typically used in specialised packaging applications for diverse products like food, beverages and pharmaceuticals. To address our concerns and maintain competition and innovation, DuPont agreed to sell a significant part of its global herbicides business and research and development (R&D) branch to FMC Corporation, a United States based chemical technologies company. Additionally, Dow agreed to sell its global business of certain specialised plastics products to SK Global Chemical Co LTD (SK Global), a new entrant in these markets.
As part of our continued efforts to preserve competition in the retail gas industry, last year we reached separate consent agreements with Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc (Couche-Tard) and Parkland Industries Ltd (Parkland). These agreements related to Couche-Tard’s proposed merger with CST Brands Inc (Ultramar) and its decision to sell a number of retail gasoline sites and dealer contracts to Parkland. As these mergers and acquisitions would have resulted in decreased competition in local markets in Ontario, Quebec, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland and Labrador, we stepped in to address the competition concerns in this important sector.
To address this concern, Couche-Tard agreed to sell 366 gas stations and gasoline supply contracts to Parkland and one gas station to Philippe Gosselin & Associés Limitée. In the subsequent sale of assets to Parkland, the Bureau concluded that a substantial lessening of competition in several markets in Ontario was likely. In those markets, Parkland agreed to sell nine gasoline supply contracts to MacEwen Petroleum Inc (MacEwen) or McDougall Energy Inc. In addition, there are two other markets where the Bureau found that Parkland was not a suitable purchaser. In the latter, Parkland also divested certain of its own assets to MacEwen, prior to the Bureau entering into either of the consent agreements.
Consent agreements were also reached with companies across a variety of sectors affecting Canadian consumers and businesses, including with:
• The Sherwin-Williams Company for its proposed acquisition of The Valspar Corporation, resolving concerns that the merger would have reduced competition for customers that require a long-term supply of large batch shipments of industrial wood coatings; and,
• Superior Plus LP for its proposed acquisition of Canwest Propane, resolving concerns that the merger would have led to a substantial price increase in the retail sale of bulk propane for many consumers, particularly those living in rural areas.
Deceptive marketing practices
While advertising aims to entice consumers to buy, it must do so in a truthful way. We promote truth in advertising by taking action to prevent or stop deceptive marketing practices and by empowering consumers to make informed choices.
2017–18 key achievements
Estimated consumer savings1
Administrative monetary penalties
Fighting for truth in advertising
We stood up to deceptive marketing and advertising in a big way in 2017–18. In September 2017, a Montreal businessman was sentenced to 18 months in jail for making false product claims and deceiving consumers about delivery times. In March 2018, the last accused in a Bureau deceptive telemarketing case was sentenced to two years less a day in jail and three years of probation for defrauding businesses in Canada and the United States. And our investigation into Thompson Hill Publishing resulted in an C$180,000 fine for making false or misleading representations and engaging in deceptive telemarketing.
In January 2018, as part of a class-action settlement related to false environmental marketing claims made by Volkswagen, Audi and Porsche, buyers and lessees of certain 3.0 litre diesel vehicles were awarded up to C$290.5 million in compensation. The Bureau also reached a consent agreement with the three Canadian automobile distributors under which Volkswagen Canada and Audi Canada committed to paying a total administrative monetary penalty of C$2.5 million.
In addition, we worked in close cooperation with Leon’s and The Brick to resolve concerns over false or misleading advertising of financing plans, bringing an end to legal proceedings we had launched in 2013. As part of this consent agreement, Leon’s and The Brick agreed to each donate C$750,000 worth of home furnishings over two years to charities in Canada.
We also reached a consent agreement with Thane Canada Inc after we found its weight loss claims for its electronic muscle stimulation devices were not based on adequate and proper testing – and were therefore false or misleading to consumers. The company agreed to pay a C$350,000 administrative monetary penalty.
Promoting truthful advertising and labelling
In 2017–18, we stepped-up our industry outreach to prevent misleading advertising and labelling. In September 2017, we held meetings with industry stakeholders from the Canadian Jewelry Association and Jewellers Vigilance Canada to find a joint solution to precious metal articles sold to consumers that were not compliant with the Precious Metals Marking Act. We also continued our work on Made in Canada representations, meeting with the president of the Canadian Shoe Manufacturer’s Association in September 2017 regarding false or misleading ‘Made in Canada’ claims and representations on footwear imported into Canada. In 2018, we delivered several presentations to the Canadian Apparel Federation on labelling requirements for textiles and apparel.
We are dedicated to ensuring that consumers are well-informed and confident in their buying decisions. Through our work, we are equipping Canadians with the knowledge they need to protect themselves against false or misleading representations and deceptive marketing practices.
2017–18 key achievements
Consumer and business alerts issued
Complaints and information requests received by the Bureau Information Centre
Raising awareness of deceptive marketing practices
A key focus of our public outreach is ensuring Canadian consumers have the tools and guidance needed to protect themselves against false or misleading representations and deceptive marketing practices. From monthly subscription traps to scams involving weight loss products, technical support and requests from fake CEOs, deceptive marketing practices have an impact on all Canadians.
We increased our outreach efforts to reach more Canadians with information about these issues, meeting our goal by issuing 12 consumer alerts and one business alert over the year. We also boosted our presence on social media to share information in an easily accessible way, achieving a 112 per cent increase in social media engagement from levels achieved in 2016–17.
In May 2017, we published the third volume of the Deceptive Marketing Practices Digest. In addition to giving consumers and businesses timely information about false or misleading representations and deceptive marketing practices, it explored how the Bureau and its international partners are working together to promote clarity and confidence in a borderless marketplace.
Helping Canadians recognise fraud
Consumers and businesses play a crucial role in the fight against fraud. When people know how to recognise and report scams, they not only protect themselves, but also help the Bureau and its partners stop fraud.
In addition to our ongoing role as chair of Canada’s Fraud Prevention Forum, we once again led Fraud Prevention Month, an annual education and awareness campaign held every March to help Canadians recognise, reject and report fraud. Over the course of the month, the Bureau and its partners from over 90 private sector firms, consumer and volunteer groups, government agencies and law enforcement, participated in a number of events and activities to raise awareness about new and ongoing scams. As part of #FPM2018, we launched the second edition of our Little Black Book of Scams, profiling the 12 most prevalent scams in Canada. We also participated in awareness campaigns like the ‘Top 10 Scams’, and the #fraudchat and #2G2BT (2 Good 2 Be True) Twitter chats to keep the conversation going about fraud.
Unnecessary and overly-restrictive regulations can stifle competition and innovation. When providing advice to governments and other decision makers, we advocate for a pro-competitive, innovation-friendly approach to regulation.
2017–18 key achievements
Representations before regulatory bodies
Other advocacy interventions2
Issue of The Competition Advocate published
Market study published
Advocating for greater competition and innovation through modernised banking regulations
From grocery shopping to business investments, virtually every aspect of Canada’s economy relies on the financial services sector. New technologies stand to bring greater speed and convenience to Canadians as they spend, borrow and invest – but to fulfil that potential, the marketplace needs to encourage more competition and innovation in this sector.
In December 2017, following 18 months of active engagement with Canadians, government partners, as well as national and international stakeholders, we published a market study of innovation in the financial services industry (fintech). Focused on emerging fintech services in retail payment systems, peer-to-peer lending and equity crowdfunding, and investment dealing and advice, the study provides policymakers and regulators with 30 recommendations on how to promote greater competition and innovation in financial services.
Our research included more than 130 interviews, 50 written submissions and a one-day workshop that brought together more than 230 participants from Canada and abroad. Since the report’s release, many financial services stakeholders have published responses indicating their readiness to continue the dialogue on this important issue. At the Bureau, we plan to carry this work forward, nurturing a competitive environment that allows Canadian fintech companies to innovate and grow globally.
Getting a grip on big data
With the expansion of digital technologies, the amount of data available has increased exponentially. While that data can be used to drive innovation and quality improvements across many industries, it may also introduce challenges for competition law enforcement. In support of our ongoing commitment to remain at the forefront of emerging competition issues in Canada, we published a discussion paper on big data to spark dialogue on how to address these challenges in ways that support innovation and competition. As part of this work we consulted with a number of partners and stakeholders, including the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada; the Canadian, American and International Bar associations; industry associations; major technology firms and leading antitrust scholars. This work was recognised by the International Antitrust Writing Awards as one of the top ‘Soft Law’ publications of 2017.
Supporting Canada’s Innovation Superclusters Initiative
The federal government is investing nearly C$1 billion in business-led ‘innovation superclusters’ – large-scale collaborations that will bring together Canadian innovators, energise the economy and help our country be a world leader in innovation.3 To encourage participation in the Innovation Superclusters Initiative, we issued a guidance document advising interested firms that in the vast majority of cases, collaborative projects promoted by the initiative will not raise competition concerns. The collaboration and partnerships encouraged by this initiative can accelerate the pace of innovation and bring new products, services and processes to market, faster and cheaper. They can also enable organisations to combine technologies and resources, leading to the development of new and better products and services for the benefit of Canadians and the economy.
Rethinking food truck regulations
A pro-competitive approach to regulation is essential to fostering competition and innovation in any industry. Promoting Fair Competition in the Restaurant and Mobile Food Industry – part of our ongoing ‘Competition Advocate’ series – highlights how competition, innovation and consumer choice can be improved by removing regulatory barriers that keep food trucks and other mobile food services from competing with brick-and-mortar restaurants. Studies have shown that food trucks can bring vitality to community streets, contribute to safety, encourage pedestrian-friendly environments, and give Canadians more affordable and convenient food options along with increased employment opportunities.
Collaborate with partners
Today’s complex and fast-moving markets stretch across borders, making it critical for us to work with our international counterparts to deliver on our mandate. Strong, mutually beneficial partnerships at all levels ensure healthy competition, build global awareness of key issues and enable action against unlawful practices – all of which help protect Canadian businesses and consumers.
2017–18 key achievements
Formal international agreements signed4
Formal domestic agreement signed
Meetings with foreign law enforcement agencies or competition authorities
International meetings and workshops
Capacity building initiatives with international partners
Promoting competition excellence at home and abroad
Collaborating with international and domestic partners allows us to engage in open dialogue to address cross-border competition concerns, build consensus and share knowledge and best practices. Ultimately, it helps strengthen competition promotion and enforcement across Canada and around the world.
One of the steps we took last year to increase collaboration with international partners was to sign a new cooperation agreement with the Japan Fair Trade Commission – promoting further cooperation, coordination and communication between our two authorities. This agreement, signed in May 2017, will increase the efficiency of investigations between our two countries and contribute to more effective enforcement outcomes. A month later, we signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with our counterpart in Colombia, the Superintendence of Industry and Commerce, to promote cooperation and strengthen cross-border competition law enforcement. We also met with US and Mexican competition authorities to reinforce North American cooperation in competition law enforcement.
Working with Global Affairs Canada, Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada as well as other departments, we continued to provide our expertise in support of key Canadian trade initiatives. This included concluding the competition policy provisions for the renegotiation and modernisation of the North American Free Trade Agreement and advancing negotiations toward a possible Pacific Alliance Free Trade Agreement.
Domestically, we signed an MOU with Consumer Protection BC in January 2018. This arrangement provides a framework for cooperation on enforcement matters, marketplace trends, policies and other issues of mutual interest – helping to foster a more competitive marketplace for the benefit of consumers and the economy, not only in the province of British Columbia, but throughout Canada.
Providing leadership on the international stage
Competition agencies around the world face similar challenges – and we are much more effective when we work together. By taking an active role in organisations such as the International Competition Network (ICN), the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the International Consumer Protection and Enforcement Network (ICPEN), we are able to share our knowledge and best practices with the international community.
We took part in several OECD meetings last year, including roundtables of the OECD Competition Committee and the Committee on Consumer Policy. Our active participation in these meetings included a presentation on the Canada–European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement and responding to questions regarding our formal submission to the OECD Competition Committee on Methodologies for Conducting Market Studies.
We continued our leadership roles in the ICN, acting as the ICN Secretariat, a member of the ICN Steering Group and co-chair of the Agency Effectiveness Working Group (AEWG). Through the AEWG, we played an instrumental role in bringing together academics and economists from competition agencies around the world to share their knowledge in important areas of competition law enforcement. In October 2017, we hosted the 14th annual ICN Cartel Workshop. Attended by 250 representatives from 50 antitrust agencies, this three-day session promoted collaboration on – and best practices for – cartel detection, investigation and deterrence related to public procurement. We also acted as the liaison between the ICN and the OECD to ensure alignment in the work of these two important bodies.
We continued to enhance and strengthen our network of partners to address anticompetitive activities and deceptive marketing practices, and promote best practices through our participation in ICPEN. The Bureau played an active role in both the spring (Berlin) and fall (Antalya) ICPEN conferences, and served once again as the coordinator for ICPEN’s Annual Internet Sweep.
Getting better together
Each year, we take part in numerous capacity-building programmes and events to help improve our own capabilities as well as those of the international competition agencies with whom we work. For example, we shared our experience and best practices at the ICN’s capacity–building workshop on due process in Singapore by facilitating a training session on integrating procedural fairness into agency decision-making and moderating a panel offering practical solutions. Again in Singapore, we participated in the Antitrust Regional Seminar on Economic Analysis in Competition Enforcement, which supported the development of competition policy and enforcement in the Asia-Pacific region. We led a ‘how-to’ session on merger control analysis and delivered a presentation on our approach to abuse of dominance cases. We also shared various aspects of competition law and policy, including merger review and exclusionary conduct, to senior officers of the Competition Commission of India using a number of presentations and case studies.
In February 2018, we delivered a presentation on compliance as part of a seminar for the staff of regional antitrust authorities at the Eurasian Antitrust Forum in Kazakhstan. In addition, we organised an ICN outreach programme on due process and transparency for the Association of Southeast Asian Nations heads of agencies.
To further strengthen cross-agency collaboration, we continued to participate in staff exchanges with our international counterparts. In 2017–18, we sent staff to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), the Korea Fair Trade Commission (KFTC) and the Hong Kong Competition Commission. We also welcomed staff from the ACCC, the KFTC, the Competition Commission of India and the Austrian Federal Competition Authority.
Investing in our people allows the Bureau to perform at its peak – and deliver the best possible outcomes for Canadians and the economy. In our view, organisational excellence begins with a respectful, diverse, healthy and inclusive work environment.
2017–18 key achievements
Training courses and information sessions offered
Public and stakeholder consultations on documents
Maintaining a high-performing workforce
When we developed our talent management strategy (Strategy), our aim was to change the way the Bureau plans, acquires, develops and retains its workforce. Over the past year, we have remained fully committed to implementing the Strategy – and to maintaining a high-performing, respectful, diverse, healthy and inclusive work environment.
Since the Strategy was launched, we have expanded our training, career development, performance, employee recognition and talent management programmes. We introduced our first in-house e-learning course, developed and started to implement a core training program for Bureau investigators and paralegals, coordinated and delivered more than 70 training and information sessions to staff, and facilitated the participation of Bureau employees in approximately 150 external training courses.
Shining a spotlight on workplace wellness
Given that, every year, one in five people will personally experience a mental health problem or illness,5 mental health awareness is key to maintaining a high-performing and healthy workplace. In 2017–18, we established a Workplace Wellbeing Network, appointed Workplace Wellbeing co-champions, implemented the ‘Not Myself Today’ campaign and held Mental Health Week to raise awareness about mental health, break down stigma and provide resources to employees.
Based on the results of our previous survey on wellbeing and mental health issues, we developed an action plan with recommendations for how to tackle some of the more pressing issues faced by our employees. Overall, we undertook 18 initiatives to build and sustain a safe, healthy, respectful and supportive work environment. These included sharing a monthly newsletter and posters to raise awareness of mental health topics, facilitating and hosting a series of group discussions and presentations, encouraging employees to participate in wellbeing and mental health-related activities and challenges, and conducting mental health first aid training sessions.
Creating a more transparent and accountable Bureau
To help us make better decisions and ensure we focus on the issues that matter most, we need tools and practices to measure and report on our activities and their impact for Canadians.
Last year, we refined our logic model and performance measurement framework, holding workshops to identify needs and results across our different activities – and determine how they connect to the Bureau’s higher-level goals. We were then able to accurately identify and refine the performance indicators and targets for our specific lines of business.
Our Quarterly Statistics Report – now the Performance Measurement & Statistics Report – features an enhanced performance measurement dashboard to provide a more comprehensive view of the Bureau’s performance. A narrative section added to the report speaks to variances in statistics, highlights key activities from the past quarter, and provides additional context on newsworthy and public-facing activities.
We also continued our efforts to identify meaningful outcome-based measures, working closely with partners such as Statistics Canada and the Bank of Canada to identify available data. As we move to implement a case management system that will help us better organise, assess and approach our case work, we will incorporate performance measurement considerations into our business needs to leverage the important insights derived from our data.
In March 2018, we published a Practical Guide to Efficiencies Analysis in Merger Reviews (the Guide) for public consultation to provide additional guidance and transparency to stakeholders and the practitioner community following a recent decision from the Supreme Court of Canada. The Guide focuses on the Bureau’s internal assessment of efficiencies prior to making an enforcement decision, and provides practical guidance on how best to engage with the Bureau when conducting this highly complex analysis.
As much as markets need competition and innovation, they also need the trust of consumers and businesses to thrive. Building that trust is a key aspect of our work, and this will continue to be at the heart of our efforts in 2018–19. This includes not only the trust that Canadians have in the marketplace but also maintaining the trust between the Bureau and the legal community involved in competition matters. It also includes trust among our partners throughout government that are involved in developing or amending regulations that will serve Canadians today and into the future.
1 Estimated consumer savings measures the total consumer savings arising from an enforcement matter in a given fiscal year.
2 Other interventions (outside formal interventions, submissions and appearances before regulatory bodies), including written submissions, letters, calls and meetings with regulatory groups and other stakeholders.
3 Innovation, Science and Economic Development. (February 2018). Innovation Superclusters Initiative, www.canada.ca/en/innovation-science-economic-development/programs/small-business-financing-growth/innovation-superclusters.html.
4 Formal international and domestic agreements include Memoranda of Understanding and other agreements.
5 Canadian Mental Health Association. (2016). Fast Facts about Mental Illness. www.cmha.ca/media/fast-facts-about-mental-illness/.