Having taken a significant step to regulate the internet in 2015, policymakers defended that position in 2016. Following the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upholding that move towards regulation, it appears that the pendulum will continue to swing in favour of regulation of the broadband internet economy.
Introduction
El Salvador
Honduras
Mexico
Nicaragua
Panama
Peru
- Peru: National Institute for the Defence of Free Competition and Protection of Intellectual Property
United States
- United States: Department of Justice, Antitrust Division
- United States: Federal Trade Commission
- United States: Cartels
- United States: CFIUS Review
- United States: Class Actions
- United States: Economics
- United States: Energy
- United States: Government Investigations
- United States: Healthcare
- United States: IP and Antitrust
- United States: Joint Ventures
- United States: Mergers
- United States: Pharmaceutical Antitrust
- United States: Private Antitrust Litigation
- United States: Technology Mergers
- United States: Telecoms
- United States: Vertical Restraints
Canada
- Canada: Competition Bureau
- Canada: Cartel Enforcement
- Canada: Merger Review
- Canada: Pharmaceuticals
- Canada: Private Antitrust Litigation
Argentina
Brazil
- Brazil: Administrative Council for Economic Defence
- Brazil: Cartels
- Brazil: Private Antitrust Litigation