Third Circuit judge says pay-for-delay decision should have waited
A trial court judge demanded greater specificity about the value of an alleged pay-for-delay agreement than the case law requires when he dismissed plaintiffs’ complaint, an appellate judge said at oral argument last week.
Subscribe to Global Competition Review
Subscribe and start reading now
Already have access? Login below
Copyright © Law Business ResearchCompany Number: 03281866 VAT: GB 160 7529 10