Seattle v Uber brings foreseeability standard to Ninth Circuit
Appellate judge Milan Smith has said that he has trouble getting past the fact that a Seattle ordinance allowing for-hire drivers to bargain collectively on compensation was “probably not foreseeable”, when assessing whether state action antitrust immunity applied to the law.
Subscribe to Global Competition Review
Subscribe to unlock unlimited access
Get news, unique commentary, expert analysis and essential resources from the Global Competition Review experts.
Already have access? Login below
Copyright © Law Business ResearchCompany Number: 03281866 VAT: GB 160 7529 10