Seattle v Uber brings foreseeability standard to Ninth Circuit
Credit: iStock/espiegle
Appellate judge Milan Smith has said that he has trouble getting past the fact that a Seattle ordinance allowing for-hire drivers to bargain collectively on compensation was “probably not foreseeable”, when assessing whether state action antitrust immunity applied to the law.
Subscribe to Global Competition Review
Subscribe and start reading now
Global Competition Review (GCR) is the complete source of news and analysis for competition practitioners. It keeps you up to speed with the issues and trends that matter, giving you the detail, and depth, you need to operate successfully.
Subscribe now
Already have access? Login below
Copyright © Law Business ResearchCompany Number: 03281866 VAT: GB 160 7529 10