Mehta ponders potential “cellophane fallacy” of search advertising substitutes
Shutterstock/Rawpixel.com
The judge presiding over the Department of Justice’s search monopolisation case has questioned one of the government’s hired experts on how to “distinguish fallacious from valid” Google search advertising substitutes.
Subscribe to Global Competition Review
Subscribe to unlock unlimited access
Get news, unique commentary, expert analysis and essential resources from the Global Competition Review experts.
Subscribe now
Already have access? Login below
Copyright © Law Business ResearchCompany Number: 03281866 VAT: GB 160 7529 10