Tom Webb

Content from this author

• CMA raised concerns about football data deal before private litigation kicked off
• German enforcer overstepped by invoking GDPR, Meta tells ECJ
• ECJ set to clarify antitrust/data interface
• CAT seeks to avoid MIF-style split in sports data claim
• UK falling behind on digital market regulation, experts say
• UK class action claim seeks £2.3 billion from Facebook
• Google agrees to Privacy Sandbox oversight
• Scraper fights back against Ryanair lawsuit
• Sports data company starts antitrust battle
• The Brussels competition bar
• Canada’s top court rejects TREB appeal
• Google faces injunction request
• An interview with Mei-Ying Huang
• Making its mark
• Taiwan’s competition bar
• English judge backs Mastercard on applicable law
• Pay-for-delay ruling exposes uncertainty in EU law
• Apple/Shazam could cause foreclosure, says Spanish official
• Laitenberger: guidance will simplify merger info requests
• Interchange fee cases, simplified
• Who’s afraid of online platforms?
• An interview with Kim Sang-jo
• Visa failed to show fees were procompetitive, English judge rules
• Kovacic calls for transparency in FTC Google decision
• Advocate General urges ECJ to extend Intel to fine reviews
• UK iiyama litigation should go to trial, appeal court rules
• BritNed counsel slams ABB defence
• UK power cables defendants fight jurisdiction
• ECJ rejects freight forwarding appeals
• Jersey court throws out abuse finding
• ECJ backs Italian enforcer in Roche/Novartis
• Singapore seeks to streamline air alliance alert
• Software provider agrees to change terms
• An interview with Mei-Ying Huang
• CAT allows Ping to introduce new evidence
• Hong Kong banks seek exemption
• AG Wahl: discriminatory prices must harm competition to be illegal
• ECJ upholds Telefónica/Portugal Telecom decision
• Choice of non-UK law bars iiyama LCD claim, says defence
• No Intel effect on iiyama claim, says Samsung counsel
• iiyama lawyer calls Intel “nail in the coffin” for defence
• US DOJ rejects FTAIA challenge to forex indictment
• English judge agrees to DG Comp trucks disclosure
• Coty judgment backs luxury manufacturers
• Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer hires in London
• Appeal court upholds Toronto Real Estate Board judgment
• European Commission sets out patent position
• MasterCard claimant counsel outlines burden of class certification
• ACCC lets Tabcorp/Tatts go ahead
• English judge finds Visa interchange fees are legal

• “Strategic mischief” possible from Brexit, claimants’ lawyer says
• Ofcom uses unprecedented emergency powers after CAT loss
• EU court won’t block publication of power cables decision
• Hannes Snellman hires in Helsinki
• CMA passing on Socrates case was “dereliction of duty”, says lawyer
• New Zealand enforcer loses estate agents case
• General Court quashes ICAP fine in first Libor judgment
• UK enforcer: voluntary information requests no longer viable
• South African court dismisses collusion claim for lack of evidence
• Concordia fights rare CMA search warrant
• Brexit negotiators seek clarity in UK/EU jurisdiction, says minister
• Antitrust has a role in data, says UK data protection head
• Flynn counsel bemoans CMA treatment
• Pfizer slams CMA’s “political” excessive-pricing decision
• General Court shuts down gun-jumping appeal
• Former air cargo judge quits under fire
• Substantive antitrust law can tackle digital economy, panel agrees
• ACCC to examine information exchange
• Untangling innovation in EU merger control
• Taiwan targets Google on Android
• New laws will help ACCC deal with high tech, says chair
• Some companies look to settle e-commerce probe
• ACCC needs to be more court-ready, says chair
• CMA beats water tanks information exchange appeal
• Australian court shows difficulty of mixing public interest and antitrust
• English judge trims air cargo claims
• English judge refuses to order disclosure of foam leniency documents
• Amsterdam court backs air cargo claims vehicle
• CAT refuses permission to appeal against MasterCard class action denial
• ECJ should uphold Italian enforcer on Roche/Novartis, AG says
• Proposed Google remedies unlikely to satisfy rivals
• ECJ denies LG and Philips cathode ray tube appeals
• Top Commonwealth court confirms Jamaica enforcer's telecoms jurisdiction
• ACCC raises concerns in Staples/OfficeMax tie-up
• NYK Line sentenced in first Australian criminal prosecution
• Judge narrows English Servier follow-on claim
• Australia fines Prysmian
• Canada tribunal rejects HarperCollins e-book challenge
• MasterCard lawyers: UK certification judgment no "death knell" for class actions
• Balmoral fine based on clear evidence, says CMA
• Qualcomm loses bid for injunction at EU General Court
• Lawyer and economist criticise Google search case
• Air cargo claimants fight for pre-2004 damages
• Air cargo carriers try to push out pre-2004 claims
• CAT removes hurdle to rail safety standalone claim
• JFTC under pressure on privilege
• Veolia files London trucks claim
• ECJ upholds Toshiba gas-insulated switchgear fine
• DG Comp opens trio of merger procedure infringement probes
• DG Comp official resists need for effects in gun-jumping