Anna Langlois

Content from this author

• House probes Khan over Wilson’s concerns
• Judge: market definition necessary in no-poach cases
• City seeks class certification against Mallinckrodt, Express Scripts
• Qualcomm entered exclusive contracts with Samsung too, cell phone purchasers say
• Judge Sorokin punts private Northeast Alliance case to New York
• FTC: Baby formula collusion probe is justified
• NY tour buses formed another unlawful joint venture, rival says
• HSBC, Scotiabank defeat silver price-fixing lawsuit
• FX platform must face price-fixing claims
• DOJ: No-poach dismissal was wrong on the law
• FTC wants constitutional challenge thrown out
• FTC advances new theories in rare pharma challenge
• Xyrem purchasers win class certification
• Brazilian boutique hires from Demarest Advogados
• DOJ, states go after Google’s internal docs
• Merck seeks to escape Baltimore’s vaccine bundling lawsuit
• Surgical Care Affiliates: recent no-poach acquittal warrants dismissal
• Concrete exec challenges per se rule for criminal conduct
• DOJ defends constitutionality of criminal Sherman Act prosecutions
• DOJ settles with Assa Abloy mid-trial
• Enforcers report witness struggles
• Senate considers legislation to splinter Google
• NCAA says plaintiffs’ damages request would violate Title IX
• Bill puts future UNC Health acquisitions closer to total antitrust immunity
• DOJ should reconsider no-poach prosections, defence bar says
• US DOJ loses another criminal no-poach case
• Fortune is "right purchaser” for Assa Abloy assets, executive says
• Black Knight challenges FTC’s constitutionality
• Former Assa Abloy exec: divestiture buyer faces challenges in untangling assets
• Ninth Circuit rejects Epic’s appeal in Apple case
• Louisiana seeks to defend its COPA law
• Google seeks to avoid app store trial
• FTC sues to block unreported hospital merger
• Antitrust immunity applies to HSR filings, hospital claims
• GOP lawmakers signal uphill battle for FTC budget boost
• Amazon misled enforcers about pricing parity policy, California says
• SCOTUS allows Axon’s ‘existential’ challenge to FTC
• Ingevity cannot escape $85 million antitrust judgment
• DOJ: Too soon for Google to challenge market definition
• Seventh Circuit grants immunity to Chicago parking deal
• Endo and Impax had non-compete agreement, FTC says
• Apple and Google prevail against search conspiracy claims
• Kanter: DOJ doing more with fewer staff
• Florida using whole-of-government approach against PBMs
• Brink: Litigating the fix ‘makes absolutely no sense’
• DOJ official: investigations may be thwarted by auto-deleting messages
• Ohio accuses Express Scripts of abusing monopsony power and collusion
• Amazon loses second bid to dismiss consumers’ pricing parity lawsuit
• Illumina/Grail had a fair trial, FTC says
• No harm means no agreement, acquitted no-poach defendants say

• Biden admin to end monopoly over organ donations
• Microsoft beats back private merger challenge
• Google: too late for DOJ to seek sanctions
• New plaintiff takes over Jiffy Lube no-poach litigation
• $5.6 billion Visa, Mastercard settlement survives
• Nexstar is illegally connected to divested TV stations, DirecTV says
• Eleventh Circuit rejects Venezuelan president’s bid to intervene in antitrust suit
• DOJ: home healthcare defendants not protected by Maine law
• Text messages suggest home healthcare defendants committed to ‘the agreement’
• DOJ witness claims he was pressured to join wage-fixing agreement
• DOJ seeks first no-poach conviction at home healthcare staffing trial
• FTC emails inhibited due process, Illumina and Grail claim
• Agriculture Department says intellectual property consolidation may harm competition
• Hospitals claim doctor fired because of misconduct, not antitrust conspiracy
• Buck: Democratic leadership tanked tech bills
• Judge again thwarts class certification against Takeda, Teva and others
• States’ third generic pharma collusion case survives
• FCC trying to run out clock on Tegna deal, Standard General claims
• Wilson: Potential path for narrower non-compete rule
• DOJ: Google systematically destroyed evidence
• Gilead beats product hopping claims ahead of trial
• Big Tech foe to leave Congress
• Google must face search engine monopolisation lawsuit, DOJ and states say
• FTC hears mixed reviews of non-compete ban
• Experts push for whistleblower incentives
• Practitioners sceptical about “sudden” DOJ policy statement withdrawals
• Investors using interlocking directorate to derail cannabis deal, rival says
• Meta/Within ruling clarifies potential competition burdens, experts say
• Meta not incentivised to make own fitness app, court finds
• DOJ official: private equity HSR compliance poses existential threat to enforcement
• Commerce Department calls for action against app stores
• DC AG pushes to revive Amazon pricing parity suit
• DOJ nabs veteran litigator for new Google suit
• Healthcare workers enthusiastic about non-compete rule, but may not see benefits
• Senators, ex-enforcers disparage Live Nation/Ticketmaster monopoly
• Comcast seeks repeat summary judgment win
• Third Circuit grapples with evidence in US Sugar appeal
• Syngenta seeks dismissal of FTC complaint
• Drugmakers and PBMs drive up insulin prices, California says
• Google seeks summary judgment in DOJ case
• FTC committed to Robinson-Patman reactivation with Pepsi/Coke probe
• US oil companies dodge antitrust claims
• Covington & Burling snags DOJ veteran from Meta
• Oversight report: FTC and DOJ usually stay in their lane
• FTC blinded by scepticism of Big Tech deals, Microsoft/Activision allege
• Meta/Within survey critiques are a “smokescreen”, FTC says
• Microsoft/Activision could suppress workers’ wages, lawsuit alleges
• Judge sceptical of Meta’s weakness claims
• Judge queries why Within sold to Meta
• FTC’s expert: Meta needs Within to own the VR ecosystem